Adjust font size:    
   
     
 

 
     
Employers Need to Reform Their Health Programs
 
 

Written by Larry Sobal, CEO, Appleton Cardiology Associates

Most employers seem to be waiting on Obama to apply some type of "fix" to our health care system. Maybe he'll find the elusive silver bullet, but I think employers have a more important role to play in this process than the president.

For all the criticism that our health care "system" is broken and we don't perform well compared to other industrialized nations, let's not lose sight of a key fact. In general, the U.S. population chooses to live a less healthy lifestyle versus most of those countries. Simply put, our diet and exercise regimens don't stack up, resulting in a wide range of self-inflicted chronic health issues. Throw in a deeply rooted entitlement mentality, with the expectation that insurance and the medical system will fix my problem(s), and it's no surprise that we spend considerably more for poorer results.

I think employers are the key to changing that trend, rather than (or in addition to) the government.

Lets provide employees with the same type of free-market incentives they face in many other aspects of their lives. The government has already provided employers the golden opportunity to do so by virtue of its December 2006 HIPAA ruling, which allows employers to vary the amount of premium contributions required from employees as long as its "wellness incentive program" meets certain regulations.

With this in mind, Appleton Cardiology is now in the second year of our Health Metrics program that provides considerable rewards to employees who attain desired health status. Our employee health metric targets, all of which are obtained as part of clinical testing that occurs in our annual Health Risk Assessment, are:

  • LDL cholesterol
  • Blood glucose
  • Blood pressure
  • Body mass index
  • Absence of nicotine use

    We chose these metrics largely based on the infamous HERO study, which demonstrated that employees with chronic health conditions cost employers considerably more versus those that don't. Our goal is to help employees (and spouses) avoid the costs and personal impact of tobacco use, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, obesity and diabetes. In our case, employees (and spouses) who meet these metrics can save as much as $1,500 per year for their contribution toward our health plan.

    Is this the perfect solution for our country's health care challenges? No, but I'll argue that government reform will have limited impact on our overall health consumption (i.e. costs) without reducing chronic disease and improving the health status of the population overall. While it's too early to form a clear conclusion, our initial results are suggesting that the size and type of our metric incentives are motivating change.

    If you want to learn more this and other progressive ways for employers to drive change, I encourage you to attend the "Hands-On Healthcare Strategies for Employers and Their Insured's" event on Feb. 10 sponsored by the Fox Cities Chamber of Commerce & Industry. Details are available on the chamber's Web site, www.foxcitieschamber.com or at 920-734-7101.



  •